Here are two video reports on immigrant Africans’ perfectly shameless demand for racial integration in Ireland, and the response from Ireland’s very modern politicians.  All at once it’s tardy, piecemeal, submissive and just plain ethno-masochistic.

The first video documents an African immigrant demonstration outside the Dáil.  Speakers from the political forces opposed to, one must suppose, the callous, head-in-the-sand policies of the Irish government included some nameless old lady who must be the light and life of Residents Against Racism, Ciaran Cuff of the Green Party, Seamus Healey (described as an Independent), Joe Costello of Labour, Arthur Morgan of Sinn Fein and his party president Gerry Adams.

The second video is an Al-Jezeera report on the Irish government’s tardy response to the integration and, specifically, education issues.  It features an Emergency School in north Dublin set up by an uncharitable body of unCatholic, school-building Marxists named Educate Together.  Ninety-five per cent of the children in the Emergency School are black, bro.

Actually, that should be brá.  But there’ll be no lilting brogue for lil Obi unless the damned, racist Dubliners can understand how happy diversity will make them.  Educate Together says that they will.  Galloping secularism is the key.  In a country where 98% of the schools are Catholic, the 48% of parents that are non-Catholic or non-practising Catholic have no condign educational choices open to them.  As so often, it’s the clever traitors who spot the gap in the market.  Educate Together has applied to open twenty new schools in the next year alone, and fully, naively expects its green, green la-la land to materialise and the rainbow peeps to skip happily over the peat bog and far away.

Among the talking heads in this second video is a gentleman named Jeanne-Pierre Eyanga Ekumeluko from Congo.  Sorry, make that Integrating Ireland.  He is sufficiently unsubtle in his pleading “to be one” with the good citizens of Dublin that he promises them another Clichy-sur-Bois experience if said oneness is delayed.  But that would only be the fault of the damned, racist Dubliners, of course.

READ MORE...

Genocide, under its original definition, includes any deliberate anti-nation program, such as that intended by the American Jewish Congress’s support of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.  Since immigration is now the primary tool of anti-national interests, we can get a rough idea of the magnitude of genocide by examining the rate of immigration to various countries—immigration driven by sentiments similar to those promoted by the American Jewish Congress:

Admittedly, it would be better to adjust the map for the degree of loss of ethnic genetic interests but, since we no longer have “academic” institutions that qualify for the name, we must make do with proxies like “immigration”.  Another problem with this sort of map is it emphasizes distortions on a per land area basis rather than on a percapita basis.  For instance, Australia looks like it is suffering less genocide than it is, and Japan looks like it is suffering more genocide than it is.

A translation by Fred Scrooby of an interview with Yves-Marie Laulan, author of Les Nations Suicidaires (1998).  Yves-Marie Laulon, economist and banker, has had a varied career that has taken him from French government cabinet posts to such international institutions as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and NATO, as well as positions with Société Générale de Banques and Crédit Municipal of Paris.  He has taught in a number of universities, including the Institute for Political Studies in Paris.  He has published a dozen works on economics and geopolitics in France and abroad.

The interview was conducted by Xavier Cheneseau, and was published Dec. 28 at Robert Steuckers’ Euro-Synergies website.  The original entry doesn’t give the interview’s date.  (Judging by certain details in the text, it may be a few years old.)

Xavier Cheneseau:  With regard to demographics you seem willfully pessimistic …

Yves-Marie Laulan:  It isn’t the author’s comments that are violent but the situation that is violent.

In fact it’s already nearly too late.  Demographic phenomena — the ones I’m dealing with, at any rate — have this special characteristic, that they are slow and they proceed largely unnoticed, precisely until it is too late.

Wartime ravages can be repaired in a few years — Germany and France managed it.  Recovery from the consequences of an economic crisis doesn’t take long.  But demographic damage can take decades, even centuries, to recover from — when recovery is possible at all. […]

But you’re partly right:  I’ve deliberately taken a provocative tone, because you need to make a loud racket to awaken the deaf.  And look at the dumbed down, dullened public opinion we are dealing with, anesthetized by daily bombardment with mass media!  Where filtering of information is concerned, today’s France resembles Ceaucescu’s Romania, only a more efficient version. 

Faced with this situation, a dissident having ideas that are out of the ordinary, such as myself — Soviet Russia’s Samizdat, as Pierre Chaunu calls it — humbly cherishes the hope, perhaps, of being, if possible, the watcher at dawn spoken of in the Bible (Isaiah), the one who remains alone at his post all night waiting for the dawn to break.

READ MORE...

On Saturday the little big men of the World Economic Forum checked out of their Davos hotels and made the hop home in the company Gulfstream.  Along with the customary hookers and political whores, the high-powered networking and, doubtless for some, the plain high, our heroes left behind all that damned public caring - at least, for another year.

Actually, the caring thing was pretty well done this year.  They concocted a public relations exercise involving a somewhat bland question:-

What one thing do you think that countries, companies or individuals must do to make the world a better place in 2008?

There was a lot of hot air vented about knowledge and poverty, climate change, and water.  But the hot button issues among the real players were the decline of the dollar as the world currency and the threat of a US recession.  These merely reflects the corporate-heavy interests of the Davos “community”.  Of the issue of the rights and interests of real people and peoples there was, of course, no sign.  Or almost no sign.  This report appeared this morning in the lower middle-class rag, the Sunday Express:-

EUROPEANS THINK ISLAM IS DANGEROUS

AN “overwhelming majority” of Europeans believe immigration from Islamic countries is a threat to their traditional way of life, a survey revealed last night.  The poll, carried out across 21 countries, found “widespread anti-immigration sentiment”, but warned Europe’s Muslim population will treble in the next 17 years.  It reported “a severe deficit of trust is found between the Western and Muslim communities”, with most people wanting less interaction with the Muslim world.

Last night an MP warned it showed that political leaders in Britain who preach the benefits of unlimited immigration were dangerously out of touch with the public.

The study, whose authors include the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey, was commissioned for leaders at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.  It reports “a growing fear among Europeans of a perceived Islamic threat to their cultural identities, driven in part by immigration from predominantly Muslim nations”.

Now, I’ve been all over the WEF’s brave new website and I can’t find a trace of the former Arch-Songster’s study.  Which is odd.  The only half-useful mention of migration which crops up via a word search on the site concerns this curious working session:-

READ MORE...

Perhaps a reader with a better memory than me can name the late John Tyndall’s only work of fiction in which, I seem to recall, British shoppers carried home plastic bags bearing the injunction, “Remember the Holocaust”.

From a propaganda perspective, that dulling degree of ubiquity still awaits us.  But the same tawdry mechanicalness, the same tendency to glaze the eyes attends the words penned for Gordon Brown in yesterday’s Daily Telegraph:-

We must not forget the Holocaust

Imagine, Remember, Reflect, React: together, these words define tomorrow’s Holocaust Memorial Day. Why imagine? Because the sheer scale of the Holocaust numbs us to its individual realities: the captivity, suffering and death of six million people, 1.5 million of them children, each with family, a history and unique emotions.

... As a boy, I was well aware of the struggle and sacrifices of the Jewish people. My father, a Church of Scotland minister, led parties of visitors to Israel twice a year for more than 20 years and wanted me to understand what the Holocaust meant.

Why remember? Because, more than 60 years after the liberation of Belsen, Treblinka and Auschwitz, and as the last of the survivors now grow old, we simply cannot afford to forget.

... Each generation must learn and understand the dark forces and culpable failures that allowed prejudice, discrimination and persecution to lead to a vast programme of mass slaughter that spanned a continent.

And as we reflect again on these events, we must react to them too, to ensure that “Never Again” is not just a slogan, but a reality.

Only by systematic efforts - such as the Holocaust Educational Trust’s Lessons from Auschwitz programme and compulsory teaching about the Holocaust in secondary schools - can we maintain a common knowledge of what happened, celebrate the courage of the few who fought it and learn the lessons for the future.

That is why we have provided funds to encourage hundreds of pupils from every school in the country to visit Auschwitz and learn of the tragedies that follow when people do not stand up. Last year 3,000 pupils travelled to Auschwitz, this year 4,000 - every secondary school offering at least two pupils the chance to see its dark truths.

Well, for one, I would not permit my daughter to be propagandised in this way.  She won’t be visiting Auschwitz.  As a father I do all I can to explain to her the strategic value of the Holocaust narrative for Jewry, and to protect her from the libel on her blood and on the blood of all Europe’s children in those unjust words: “Each generation must learn and understand the dark forces and culpable failures that allowed prejudice, discrimination and persecution to lead to a vast programme of mass slaughter that spanned a continent.”

I suppose it is probable that, being a politician, Brown is lying about his awareness as a boy of the “struggle and sacrifices of the Jewish people”.  After all, Jewish donors keep his party afloat and, of course, “befriend” it (as they “befriend” the Conservatives).  Brown has no alternative but to be an enthusiastic Judeophile and devotee of the “magnificent” Jewish homeland (as Cameron has to be, too).

Realpolitik - mere moral or intellectual weakness - would, then, be some kind of fig-leaf for the man.  But if he is sincere ... if he really believes that the hearts of English children hold “dark forces” - some original sin of hate of the semite - then we are faced with something quite different.  We are faced, in Brown, with a Judaised soul in which the normal empathy for kind, and even for the children of kind, has been perverted.  It’s true, of course, that at this level, the level of foundational loyalty, one cannot serve Jewry and kind.  Jewry’s profound unwillingness, as expressed in the exploitation of the Holocaust, to act peacefully towards our children simply does not leave that possibility open.

The moral of the story, on this Holocaust Memorial Day in Britain, is that we should cooly explain the hateful uses to which the narrative is put.  We owe Jewry and Mr Brown and the political Establishment only that.

From July 16, 2006:

the mercantile powers… are reduced to doing the only thing they can… “printing” money as a last resort before they bolt for the door to avoid their, otherwise, certain demise.

Today: “Fed’s big easing a ‘once-in-a-generation’ event”:

“It’s a once-in-a-generation event,” Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, said. In recent years, the Fed has rarely acted between scheduled meetings of the committee, and almost always in increments of one-quarter or one-half point. It was the biggest single cut since October 1984.

This won’t help the fundamental problem which is hyper-centralization of wealth and power.  To help that they’ll need something like a net asset tax with citizen’s dividend and as history has shown, they’d rather assassinate NAT/citizen dividends proponents and start a world war.

UPDATE 9AM PDT: From Glenn Beck:

When Bernanke comes out at 8:00 in the morning and has an emergency rate cut of 75 basis points, which is a big cut, when he makes a rate cut at 8:00 in the morning and futures actually go down, that’s not good. That’s not good.

And Soros says:

“I’m not looking for a worldwide recession… I’m looking for a significant shift of power and influence away from the US in particular and a shift in favour of the developing world, particularly China.

This of course, matches the “bolt for the door” plans by Jews:

The fear expressed that “a real decline of the West, particularly the United States, would have dramatic consequences for the Jewish people,” also led to controversy. Brandeis University president Jehuda Reinharz agreed that this type of decline can be expected “in the coming two decades” - but Stuart Eisenstadt was less emphatic about it. He believes the United States will remain the leading power. In all events, it was agreed the Jews “should strengthen cultural links with non-Western civilizations, particularly China and also India,” powers that are on the ascent. This is not a question of preference or closeness; it is a question of survival, of readiness for the future. How should this be done? That will have to be the topic of discussion in the next gatherings already being planned.

Today also from the Washington Post:  Increasing numbers of workers are “Highly Skilled And Out Of Work: Long-Term Joblessness Spreads in Middle Class”:

Once concentrated among manufacturing workers and those with little work history, education or skills, long-term unemployment is growing most rapidly among white-collar and college-educated workers with long work experience, studies have found, making the problem difficult for policymakers to address even as it grows more urgent…A 2004 study found that workers who lost a job in 2001 to 2003 took an average pay cut of 17 percent in their new jobs, more than double the average cut of those displaced in the late 1990s…It is very important to understanding the level of anxiety that the work force feels as a whole.

At the beginning of the American Revolution, Thomas Paine called on his fellow colonists to forge a new society where power was dispersed among the citizens. “Let the crown … be demolished,” he urged, “and scattered among the people whose right it is.”

This sentence is taken from a speech on Saturday to the Fabian Society conference ‘Change the World’ by David Milliband, Britain’s Jewish Foreign Secretary.  Paines’ words resonate strangely in the nationalist mind.  For who, exactly, are “the people whose right” sovereignty is?

But, of course, the Fabian Society is the senior left-liberal and one-time socialist political movement in Britain, and none of its company think as we do.  Its company thinks in ways that would alarm not only us, but any normal Briton were these thoughts not coated in electoral blandness and the appearance of the bien pensant before they are uttered.

This is how Miliband continues his speech:-

Today Paine’s world is coming into view. Around the world there is what I call a ‘civilian surge’. Born of the death of deference in the North and West, the collapse of communism in the East, the spread of democracy in the South. Everywhere it is the rise of the better educated and if not better educated better informed citizen who knows, in real time, about how other people, often far away, live their lives; who is more distrustful of traditional sources of authority; who is yearning for greater freedom and power; who is more able through technology to produce and distribute information, more able to hold power to account.

... This civilian surge embodies the ideal of progressive politics, for what is progressive politics if not the desire to see more people as actors rather than spectators in life’s dramas?

But alongside the rising tide of human rights and democratic values there is the reality of growing insecurity. There are the local problems of crime and anti-social behaviour, personal angst caused by more fragile families and less permanent relationships, but the global threats of climate change, financial instability, and transnational terrorism are potent and invasive.

Freedom and security have always been the twin aims of progressive politics. The unique fact about the present time is that people feel more free but less secure.

What a humbling statement for a High Priest of progressivism to make to a Progressive Church.  And yet to the nationalist mind nothing could have been more predictable than the destructiveness of the politics of anti-nation, anti-family, anti-Nature.

Miliband draws attention to the two “not incompatible” but never quite “reconciled” left-traditions of radical liberalism and social democracy.  But it is as if “the local problems of crime and anti-social behaviour, personal angst caused by more fragile families and less permanent relationships” have punched huge holes in radical-liberal confidence.  Nowhere in his speech does he raise his eyes to the distant horizon of new and inspiring individual freedoms.  There are none.  So the level of it is “more power to neighbourhoods to shape local services and own assets, with more power for citizens through direct payment and personal budgets in health and social care.”  The freedom train rattles and lurches on, blindly, shamelessly, but quite purposelessness now, and for the most part translated onto a stage that is too mundanely depersonalised to carry meaning for the personal life as, indeed, the great, freeing cult of the individual was meant to carry meaning.

As a political movement social democracy is unquestionably more intact, though that, too, has been assailed by doubt.  Dench and Gavron, David Goodhart and Robert Putnam have all quietly, inconveniently pointed to the confounding of social justice in and by the MultiCult.

So all that will remain, after homosexual adoption, transsexual equality, religious hate speech legislation ... after the anti-majoritarianism, the racial dispossession, the dissolution of nationhood ... all that will remain is the burgeoning size and power of the state.  And out of that, with the force of inevitability, will flow a matching appetite for legislation and for control.  How but through these things will a state machine that sows chaos for freedom, and has no further democratic raison d’etre, hold on to its monopoly of power?  Leviathan will rise in a last desperate, totalitarian attempt to maintain the unmaintainable status quo.

If we care to look we can see it rising already.

For example, a domestic application of naked power, however honeyed by political skills, will necessarily excuse itself with a foreign fig-leaf or two - what Miliband calls “values”, but is simply a coercive internationalism.  And he duly addresses UK foreign policy issues further on in his speech:-

... We are required to ask big questions about what we are willing to do to extend individual rights around the world

... Universal values are real and popular. They raise really hard questions about how they are spread, but let’s not be ashamed to talk about them. They are part of our tradition, not a neocon invention.

... In the 19th and 20th centuries foreign policy and progressive values were often uncomfortable partners. Interests predominated over values. The new context holds out huge opportunities for progressive politics.

... In the 21st century, we need to apply both the social democratic and liberal traditions to maximise the opportunities from globalisation and manage the risks.

Tom Paine the English radical, Tom Paine the American revolutionary, Tome Paine the member of the French National Convention might, I suppose, have admired such apparently humanistic objectives.  But they mean nothing whatsoever to the true peoples of Britain.  They would garner scarcely a vote at election time.  They quite wonderfully depict the detachment into domestic policy blandness and irrelevance, and the shift to action abroad, that doubtless must afflict a destroyer of nationhood.  This Leviathan’s public allegiance will be to peoples far away who have absolutely no allegiance to it.  If that sounds laughable, even crazy, it’s because that’s what a politics of spreading the Western social democratic and economic model is.

The only question is whether we the people can survive long enough to strike the blow that brings Leviathan down.  Pray that we can, and that for our children’s sake it is a political one

The Lega Nord mayor of Cittadella, Masimo Bitonci, has found a way to fight the immigrant tide in his ancient walled town.  He has enacted a local law to discriminate for productive immigrants.  But it seems that more than just the obvious illegals and undesirables find themselves caught by it.

Here’s Al Jezeera (albeit reporting squarely within the usual terms - we get to hear about the nice folks from poor, backward Moldavia denied the chance of a new life, and the fabulous boon their cheap labour would bring to native Italians):-

The Al Jezeera reporter further informs us that, “The idea has now spread to two hundred towns in the (Veneto) region, and dozens more across Italy are interested in adopting the new rules.”  All perfectly legal, and there’s nothing central government can do about it.